POP CULTURE
Movie Reviews













Home | About Us | Contact Us | Archives





Harvey Milk film bio a flawed gem with great performances!
 


At the height of the Proposition 8 protests, the producers of "Milk" - the screen bio on gay activist Harvey Milk - released their much-anticipated film in local Theatres.

Needless to say - the issue of "gay rights" - ended up front row center all over the landscape in the past few weeks.

Although "Milk" is a captivating tale that sweeps the audience up into its open arms, respected Gus Vant Sant's attempt to score a commercial Hollywood-style hit ended up splintering the gem.

In the opening scenes, the lens focuses on a Harvey Milk that seems so foreign to us.

Milk is not only slaving away in a mundane job he detests in New York City, but still in the closet sexually, and living a sort-of double life.

In the subway one night - a handsome young man catches his approving eye (played by actor James Franco), and before you can say promiscuous pre-A.I.D.S. days - the strange bedfellows end up in the sack and musing about the future.

Shortly thereafter, the twosome head off to San Francisco to seek a better lifestyle as live-in lovers.

When Milk and his boyfriend set up shop in the Castro area, they suddenly encounter a prejudice against "gays" all around them.

So, out of necessity, Mr. Milk is forced to take action to not only assert his own rights, but those of others around him.

When people think of Milk, they undoubtedly recall that the charming persuasive activist was the first openly gay man to land a post in the public political arena.

However, many are probably unaware of the fact that when Milk first made a couple of bids to run for office, he lost.

In fact - it was not until there was a rezoning of San Francisco neighborhoods (with the specific intent of ensuring diverse communities would have the opportunity to elect one of their "own" to represent their interests in the city politics) that Milk finally won.

Gus Van Sant takes an insightful in-depth foray into that political adventure with great success.

Disturbing footage of Anita Bryant - culled from old news reports and TV Talk show - also dredges up disturbing memories of yesteryear as the drama unfolds on the screen.

The lament of the day from religious fundamentalists?

"Homos are sick and they need to be cured."

"Give them their rights" - and next - "rapists, prostitutes and murderers" will be demanding theirs, too.

Shortly after Milk is elected to the Board of Supervisor, he ends up locking horns with another Supervisor on the Board - Dan White (played with great sensitivity by Josh Brolin) - who is obviously homophobic.

In fact, Milk's win at the polls grates on White's nerves because the gay lifestyle goes against his family values.

During a struggle for power and dominance - a conflict arises - and White ends up murdering Milk and Mayor Moscone.
When films are made about gays, the characterizations are stereotypical; as a result, the performances on screen often end up being quite stilted.

Here, the acting is natural and believable.

In fact, Emile Hirsch and James Franco turn in the most remarkable characterizations of their careers to date.

On the other hand, I found that Sean Penn's acting was a little forced in a couple of scenes.

In one prominent conversation with another character during the course of the film, Penn appeared to be "acting" gay.

Maybe it was just a misguided attempt to capture a Milk mannerism that fell flat.

But, for those of you who have seen photographs of Milk - or news footage of the man - it's obvious that when it comes to physicality, Sean and Harvey were cast from different moulds.

Yet, Penn manages to overcome that obstacle (and for the most part) turns in a stellar performance.

Gus Van Sant's approach was pretty much on the money, too.

Some may criticize the director's bold-faced recreation of a handful of events (and the subsequent "imagined" dialogue to breathe life into those scenes) that there were no eyewitnesses to.

For this reason, Van Sant wisely chose to incorporate shots of Milk recording a "journal" of his thoughts, if only to suggest the screenplay was loosely-based on some of that historic material.

However, I found the ending quite objectionable.

Just prior to the closing scenes - before the murder takes place - Van Sant shot a scene of "Milk" in conversation with his ex-lover on the telephone in which he chats about attending the Opera that night.

A few minutes later - when Dan White storms into Milk's office and shoots him down in cold blood - Van Sant proceeds to take wild artistic license.

For example, Van Sant's lens captures Milk falling forward towards an open window after he's been hit - at which point - a shot of a poster advertising the tragic Opera fills the screen for a split second or two.

Then, there is a close-up on Milk.

Now, it appears from the expression on Penn's face, that last thoughts are flashing through Milk's mind (what was/what could have been) before the supervisor finally succumbs to the wounds and drops to the floor.

Here, Mr. Van Sant has chosen to heighten the drama of the murder - interject some editorial comment of his own - and in the process has managed to deliver up a Hollywood-style ending to please the studios.

Shameful!

The Milk story has stood on its own as a great American tragedy for decades.

No sly maneuvering or fake props were ever needed to "milk" it along.

In my mind's eye, Van Sant's "poetic license" amounted to overkill.

"Overkill means pouring another pail of gasoline on a baby that's already burning nicely."

(unknown author)


Franco ideal lover?
 
 
 
Che...two-part 4-hour plus (yawn) with strong performances by excellent cast!
 



If you're going to catch "CHE" - which is being unveiled this week at the AFI Film Fest - the best place to catch the much-heralded release by controversial director - Steven Soderbergh - is where the press slipped in to view it today.

Michael Hall's plush little theatre on Wilshire in Beverly Hills is comfy enough to soften the mind-numbing ramblings of what ended up being an interminably-long film.


It's doubtful I would have held out 'til the end, had I attended a preview at a regular movie house with cramped seating and poor screening facilities.


I arrived early, so I was able to snatch up one of the big comfy easy chairs at the back.

Even still, Che is a four-hour plus celluloid offering that is tough to sit through for the most-patient of film buffs.

If I was required to take a gander at one more close-up shot of a military boot, ticking clock, or soldier standing around in the jungle engaging in idle chit-chat, I would have screamed bloody murder.

Get me outta here!

Albeit, there was a half-hour intermission, but the big screen bio amounts to a bloated overly-long tribute to Soderbergh's ego and an exercise in excess.

Yes, there is a taut little film with the potential to impact somewhere, but it's trussed up inside a lot of marbled fat!

The film starts off slow. Continues, slowly. Then, slowly ends at the close of the first two-hour segment without having accomplished a heck of a lot.

Except to cause me to doze off a couple of moments here and there in the dark.

But - the 2nd part of the ambitious bio grips - jolts the audience out of a deep slumber - and turns down an entertaining path.

Thankfully!

Of course, Benicio Del Toro is fascinating to marvel at from beyond the footlights, as always.

His performance is worth the price of admission alone.


Out-of-the blue, Matt Damon (gee, I think that was him) sauntered into a scene for about two minutes or so, then vanished into thin air.

Duh!

What was that all about?


Frankly, the most appealing aspect of the film for me, was the highly stylized approach that Soderbergh took at various junctures as the film unfolded on the silver screen.

Even still, Che was uneven on those occasions, too.

Maps that were color-fed onto the screen on at least two occasions - to spoon-feed and educate the filmgoer about regions affected by the revolution - didn't gel for me.

At times, I was inclined to pinch myself.

Had I been magically transported back to a boring geography class of yesterday?

But - black & white shots of a fifties-era Cuba and intriguing camera-work which strategically layered scintillating images throughout the big budget fiasco - appealed to my artistic sensibilities now and then.

At times, the soundtrack stirred the emotions, and added an undercurrent of drama.

But, after awhile, the score became an obvious tip-off.

Whenever a particular strain of music was obsequiously ushered in - the audience was keen to the fact by now - that something downright intriguing was about to happen right before their eyes.

Golly!

Perk up, get ready!

Thoroughly well-acted, well photographed, and well - ill-conceived.


I just betcha that if Soderbergh withdrew to the edit bay - and trimmed about forty-eight minutes of fat - he might have a dynamite little art-house film on his hands.

Til then, the release smacks of a ceremonial barge floating down the river, aimlessly.


No doubt, Che will be a big yawn, to many.

 

 

The World We Want

 

 
If given the golden opportunity, can mere children rise up and tackle social and political issues - that have challenged their parents for decades - and effect real change?

After screening "The World We Want" - an uplifting documentary which premiered at the AFI Fest this afternoon - I wholeheartedly assert that the answer is a resounding "yes".

The well-crafted doc focuses on an organization - Project Citizen - which gives children from a handful of participating Nations around the globe an opportunity to launch a project that addresses the needs of a particular community.

The ones that show promise from the get-go ranged from one that focused on the need for clean drinking water in an African Village, to a call for stringent controls on underage gambling in Russian, and an altruistic goal to create a constitution in a war-torn town crying out for a healing solution.

The inspirational log follows the students as they struggle to convince local and national leaders to implement their proposed ideas for the good of all in the community. Like their parents before them, the "dreamers" run smack dab into red tape - and the tangles of bureaucracy that threaten to thwart their unselfish plans - before they get out of the starter's gate.

In the final analysis - after marvelling at their bold-faced efforts for a call to action - it becomes quite evident that children from races of all persuasion (as one astute young lady pointed out) are the same at the "core". And - of course - each is just as enthusiastic, emotional, passionate, articulate, engaging, and determined - as the other in pursuit of a vision for a future they recognize they must seize as their own.

After reviewing hundreds of the programs - and taking stock of the issues that were tackled - producer Patrick Davidson selected eight stories to feature in the upbeat "World We Want".

The tales are all heartwarming and inspiring.

"We the People - Project Citizen" is an international program for young people funded by the U.S. Department of Education, by an act of Congress (1995). The program is administered and implemented in the U. S. and abroad by the Center for Civic Education (CCE) which is a National and International leader in Civic Education.

It's important to note that the documentary, on the other hand, was financed entirely through private investments.

Info: www.civiced.org

 

HAIRSPRAY...Glitzy adaption of hit stage musical!


If you like kitsch and don't mind a little plaid or a cardigan or two, HAIRSPRAY is the movie for you.

The Broadway hit was recently adapted for the big screen and never lets up from the get-go.

The setting is in Baltimore in the 1950's.

The premise goes something like this.

Each day, when the school bell signals the end of class, excited teens dash home to turn on the boob tube to grind and gyrate to popular tunes on the Corny Collins Show (undoubtedly styled after yesteryear's trail-blazing American Bandstand once hosted by the affable perennial host Dick Clark).

Here, James Marsden has more sex appeal in his baby finger than Mr. Clark ever resonated in his entire being.

Sorry, Dick!

In fact, there are a number of stand-out performances by up-and-coming young performers.

For instance, actress Nikki Blonsky is captivating in the lead role as "Tracy Turnblad".

And, there's also a surprising on-screen turn by Michelle Pfeiffer, as well.

One day Tracy receives a slip for tardiness and heads down to detention hall where she encounters a juggernaut of appealing black youths lithely jiving and raucously harmonizin' to a jungle beat she finds irresistible.

At last, she is in her element.

When she learns that Corny Collins will be auditioning for a replacement for the popular Dance Show, she's first in line to strut her stuff - all jowls and cheek - much to the dismay of the Station Manager who has a slanted eye towards what is palpable for the hit music show.

Of course, Tracy is turfed out because she's way too hefty and a tad beyond light of foot.

But, some intriguing plot twists put her up front with all the underdogs rooting for her on the way to the annual "Miss Hairspray Talent Competition".

The musical numbers are all big and glitzy and way over-the-top - but in their context - make HAIRSPRAY truly entertaining toe-tapping bill-of-fare.

Unfortunately, the Travolta bit didn't work for me.

John, whatever were you thinking?

The role was more suited for a "Divine" type, if you get my drift.


 
















 
 
Tilda Swinton "Julia" role of Oscar calibre! Flawed-film has limited appeal



After Tilda Swinton wrapped up her talk at the AFI Fest tribute to her career last week, her handlers urged filmgoers to remain in their seats; after all, there was a surprise.

Swinton's new feature - "Julia" - was going to be unveiled for all the dedicated fans who showed up to toast the talented actress at the prestigious event.

In the opening scenes, the producers quickly established that Swinton's character - Julia - was a chronic alcoholic struggling to maintain a semblance of normalcy in her troubled life.

When her main sponsor (Saul Rubinek/Canadian Actor) gives her an ultimatum - clean up, or else hit-the-road - Julia goes into a tailspin.

Will there ever be a way out?

Early in the film, Julia crosses paths with a young Mexican mother, emotionally distraught over the loss of custody of her child to his grandfather.

Soon, the oddball duo are hatching a plot to "kidnap" the child which - ultimately - will kill two birds with one stone.

Swinton's character will acquire a much-needed influx of cash to launch a new life for herself elsewhere (anywhere, please!) while the mother - God bless her - will lovingly turn to nurturing parental duties long overdue.

Understandably, things go awry.

During the course of the "grab" - Julia mows down the kid's guardian with a late-model vehicle - and ends up on the lam when the shocking news hits the airwaves and commands the attention of the local police.

Although Julia manages to set up a drop for a $2 million ransom - the grandfather is a wealthy old coot bent on getting the child back - it is quite evident when she shows at the pick-up location that the authorities are lurking on the sidelines to nab her and recover the young boy.

At this juncture, there is a wild ride into the desert to escape the clutches of the authorities, a few testy moments with the confused victim, then a hair-spin high-speed chase with ICE which triggers Julia's frenzied escape south of the border into Mexico out-of-harm's way (so she thinks).

Now, the plot thickens. (sickens?)

To paraphrase an old line from a popular musical:

"She had it coming".

Because of her carelessness, and a false sense of security, a nasty plot twist unfolds.

In fact, the tawdry tale takes a convoluted turn, into surreal territory.

Suddenly - without warning - the intense drama turns into a show-down at High Noon where gunslingers play for keeps under a dark and moody midnight sun.

Ms. Swinton sinks her teeth into this role and ends up a winner by virtue of a multi-faceted complex portrayal which resonates with truth.

In particular, I was wowed by Ms. Swinton's uncanny ability to take stilted dialogue that any actor would have turned into high melodrama (or kitsch) - and not only make sense of it - but touch the filmgoer in intriguing thought-provoking ways.

A gritty on the edge - emotionally-charged roller-coaster ride - the Berlin Festival stand-out is not an easy one-hundred-and-sixty plus minutes to settle into or be at ease with.

Swinton nabs it, though.

Her performance in Erick Zonca's exotic hybrid thriller is being touted as a sure win for a Golden Bear overseas (Best Actress Award).

All elements considered, "Julia" begs the question.

Can an ill-conceived feature film - gone wild at the helm - rustle up an Oscar nomination for one of its deserving players, in spite of the odds against the fatally-flawed gem?

The envelope, please!
















 
 
 
Hunger a knock-out drama about IRA Political Prisoner Bobby Sands!
 


If you live in Los Angeles, you've no doubt heard horror stories about the abuse inmates have suffered at the hands of perverse jailers down at the County Jail at Twin Towers.

In "Hunger" - a new release screened at the AFI Fest - shocking scenes of prisoners being beaten with clubs by guards in riot gear are depicted on film.

Unlike the County Jail, however, the inmates portrayed in "Hunger" are political prisoners.

The prison drama is a true story which is set in Maze Prison (Northern Ireland) which recalls the highly emotional events of the IRA HUNGER STRIKE in 1981 led by Bobby Sands.

The producers describe the feature as a timely exploration which - ultimately reveals - what happens when body and mind are pushed to the uttermost limit.

In the opening scenes, filmgoers are taken aback and squirm in their seats - when one of the main characters is forced to strip down in front of a handful of pig-headed guards - and summarily humiliated into submission as he is carted off to his dreary cell.

From the offset, the stark images on screen are difficult to digest.

In one revolting scene, a prisoner scoops up handfuls of human feces and brazenly smears the flaking surface of the wall with the earthy pigment, in utter defiance.

In another, guards don riot gear - then thrust naked prisoners headlong down a narrow gauntlet - at which point they mercilessly beat and batter the inmates to a pulp.

Moments later - Sands and his cohorts - are degraded and humiliated further when guards slip on rubber gloves and conduct brutal cavity searches (at both ends).

Talk about breaking the human spirit or trampling upon a man's dignity!

But, the soldiers of fortune spit in their charges faces and fight back violently, vowing never to succumb.

Regular visits from wives, girlfriends and loved ones are a saving grace and offer up tender moments that resonate deeply, in an otherwise emotionally-charged celluloid experience that sickens the toughest hard case.

 
 
On these occasions, filmgoers chuckle over the inventiveness of the sneaks who managed to smuggle contraband in to their lovers under the very noses of the stern watchful guards ever-present.


 
After a prison riot breaks out, there is a lock-down at H-Block, and the prisoners embark on a spirited hunger strike.

 
At this juncture, the audience witnesses a grueling metamorphosis as the lack of nourishment weakens the stanima, breaks down the flesh - and likewise - invites an onslaught of disease and open sores which quickly ravish the limp bodies til death.

In advance press notices, director Steve McQueen underscored the filmmaker's "Hunger" goals.

"I wanted to show what it was like to see, hear, smell, and touch in the H-Block in 1981."

"What I wanted to convey is something that you cannot find in books or archives: the ordinary and the extraordinary, of life in this prison."

"Yes, the film is also an abstraction of what it is to die for a cause."

In one scene, a female politician is heard to note in a voice-over, with disdain.

"They have turned to a hunger strike for pity."

Curious, that!

When Gandhi commenced with a hunger strike on behalf of his countrymen in India, no one ever accused the spiritual leader of that lowly bid for sympathy.

The independent feature, which screened at the conservatory grounds in Los Feliz under the auspices of the AFI Fest, was shot overseas on location.

"It was not possible to film in H-Block, but a shoot in Northern Ireland was essential," noted the director.

In the final analysis, the making of the film was a coming together, he asserted.

For example, once on location with his Northern Ireland cast and crew, it became apparent how many people had been touched by the story initially when the dramatic tale unfolded in 1981.

"Remarkably," he pointed out excitedly, "everyone knew where they were when Bobby Sands died during the hunger strike. Everyone had some kind of relationship to the events at the time."

As expected, the prison scenes in "Hunger" are pretty harsh.

However, Mr. McQueen has weaved into the stark tapestry, reflective moments that resonate in an almost poetic way on occasion.

For instance, McQueen has facilitated images of bare trees and drifting snow outside the prison walls, to hint at the healing passage of time.

On occasion, there are eloquent silences and subtle perceptions about the natural order of things that speak volumes, too.

"Hunger" was shot on 2 perf 35mm with an aspect ratio of 2:35:1.

According to McQueen, by using this ratio, there's bound to be a relationship to something else in the frame which sets the stage for a powerful narrative.

Here, it is a thought-provoking, dynamic one.

Although "Hunger" is a tough ride, it is a rivetting film experience, nonetheless.

Filmmaking at its very best!


 

 

 

Ed Wood's Plan 9 from Outer Space screens at Insomniac Cinema!

 

 

 

To the delight of many, Insomniac Cinema screened - "Plan 9 from Outer Space" - recently at the Regency Theatre in the Fairfax district.

"Plan 9 from Outer Space" was written, produced, and directed by eccentric Hollywood filmmaker - Ed Wood - in 1958 (released in 1959).

The film stars Maila "Vampira" Nurmi, Gregory Walcott, and Tom Mason.

In an odd-ball scenario, Wood claimed that "Plane 9" also posthumously starred horror film star - Bela Lugosi - through use of archive footage and a brief scene of the actor shot by Wood just before Lugosi's death in 1956.

However, it is important to note that Lugosi's character was primarily portrayed by chiropractor, Tom Mason.

In a nutshell, the hilarious cult piece is about a race of extraterrestrials who seek to stop humans from creating a doomsday weapon that may destroy the universe.

In the course of doing so, the aliens implement a surefire - "Plan 9" - scheme to resurrect Earth's dead as zombies to get the planet's attention, which ends up causing chaos.

Johnny Depp fans may recall that the popular screen actor portrayed the eccentric director in a Hollywood-style film version of his life, "Ed Wood".

In conjunction with the "new" "improved" "colorized version" of "Plan 9", the Regency screened an offbeat collection of home videos which took a rare hilarious glimpse into Wood's real-life character and upside-down personal life.

Clips showed jaw-dropping scenes of Wood waltzing about the house in drag, feeding his dog birthday cake, you name it!

Of course, "Plan 9" was the piece de resistance.

Ed Wood was in top "worst" directing form at the helm here.

The god-awful writing, cheesy special effects, and numerous glaring production errors, herald the myriad reasons why "Plan 9 from Outer Space" is often regarded as a leading candidate for the title of "worst movie ever made".

In fact, the revival-house classic earned Edward D. Wood, Jr. a posthumous "Golden Turkey Award" for worst director ever.

Catch a future screening if you can. It's a hoot!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cotillard's Oscar-Winning role on the life of Edith Piaf!

 
“La Vie En Rose” is a feature film about the triumphant - yet tragic tale - of the French chanteuse, Edith Piaf.

Known as the Little Sparrow - the diminutive singer sprang from the gritty impoverished streets of Paris - where she enchanted passers-by with her robust naive renditions of popular songs of the day.

Unfortunately, her childhood was fraught with humiliating misfortunes.

For good reason, the filmmakers intently scrutinized those tender years with great sensitivity and in minute detail with the specific aim of shedding light on this complex intriguing personality.

For the most part, the subject matter is handled well.

Abandoned by her parents as a toddler, Edith was taken in by a Madame at a local brothel.

Understandably, it wasn’t long before the diminutive songbird was out on the mean streets mixing with ne’er do wells.

The conniving beggars, crafty pick-pockets and unsavory pimps - who traverse the seedy landscape onscreen in the engaging screen bio-pic - often pressured her for a take of her daily spoils.

At one point, Piaf was under investigation for her alleged associations with thugs in the underworld. But, the prosecutors caved in when they realized the evidence was lacking and they were essentially holding an empty bag.

Edith was released without much ado, but for a short period, her image was tarnished publicly.

There is some focus on Piaf and the monkey-on-her back, as well.

The emotional songstress was inclined to slosh down the ale with gusto as a young woman. Self-medication, perhaps?

And, sadly - years later - she became addled by a dependency on drugs.

Piaf, after all, was an uneducated unsophisticated woman who generally fluttered in the wind - this way ‘n that - without any particular purpose or direction in life.

Undoubtedly, the fragile woman was traumatized by haunting images of her troubled past.

One day, an Angel appeared in the form of a talent manager, who was versed in the Musical Arts.

He spied the young diamond-in-the-rough belting out a tune on a street corner and took her under his wing.

Probably one of the most entertaining segments of the film fires up when the audience witnesses the magical healing transformation from lonely street urchin to Concert-Hall vocalist under his tutelage.

At one point, Director Olivier Dahan, flashes back to the exhausting rehearsals Piaf endured at the hands of her new mentor.

With keen insight - he manages to convincingly depict the Maestro as he allegedly was - a relentless taskmaster hammering away nonstop pointers on phrasing, proper breathing, and the importance of persona on stage.

“Such beautiful hands,” he assures her. “Use them.”

Aghast at the thought, she awkwardly thrusts them into her pockets as if they were dead-weights. In time, though, hand gestures became an integral part of the vocalist’s emotionally-thrilling performances.

The film shifts non-stop from one rough and ragged period of her life to another, then back again.

Frankly, I found the storytelling methodology choppy, distracting, and not very impressive.

In contrast - the producers of “Lady Sings the Blues” facilitated the powerful stylish technique to sweep up an audience of yesteryear to emotional heights, with great effect.

A plateau - that ”La Vie En Rose” was in dire need of - which was never realized.

My favorite scenes occur when the spotlight is turned on Piaf and her on-the-down-lo tryst with a Professional Boxer.

In an era of restrained social graces, the high-profile couple were forced to sneak around in out-of-the way love nests for fear of being found out.

The winsome twosome were quite a duo.

He knocked ‘em out in the ring, she on stage.

In one scene, the handsome virile athlete laughingly noted their jig was obviously up.

“Every time I go into a restaurant in Paris, the band starts playing your hit song, La Vie En Rose,” he chuckles.

Sadly, the romance ended tragically.

Without ruining it for you - I’ll just suffice to say that the subtle encounter inferred in the box-office hit - has been bestowed upon but a precious few.

The scripted tale of her mystical experience with St. Teresa of Lisieux moved me, as well.

In the past, I have experienced the Saint’s presence in my own life, and can attest to the veracity of such claims.

One of the most powerful scenes breathes to life on the screen when a young composer is ushered into Piaf’s elegant suite to play a tune he has penned for her remarkable voice.

At the urging of a handler, the young man slips onto the piano bench and nervously begins to play.

Hardly a few bars into the tune, Piaf issues a command. Stop!

“I like it,” she cries out excitedly to the pianist.

“It’s me. It’s what I’ve been looking for. I want it. Continue.”

In what is probably the most powerful dramatic moment in the film, the audience witnesses Piaf’s remarkable performance of her signature song - “NO REGRETS” - which causes movie-goers to openly sob in the theatre.

In fact, there was barely a dry eye in the house.

As I sit here keying in this observation, shivers run up-and-down my spine.

They say, that’s a sign of a spiritual presence in the room.

Of course, all this was only made possible, due to the remarkable performance of Marion Cotillard which won her the coveted Oscar this past year.

New York Times critic Stephen Holden put it this way,

“Marion Cotillard’s feral portrait of the French singer Edith Piaf as a captive wild animal hurling herself at the bars of her cage is the most astonishing immersion of one performer into the body and soul of another I’ve ever encountered in a film.”

A little over the top, but a bang on assessment.

Although flawed, “LA VIE EN ROSE” is potent filmmaking.

If you take the journey, be sure to take along some tissues.

You’ll need ‘em!

Hotels Combined PTY LTD

 

CheapOair.com

Internet  Media Services
Julian Ayrs, Inc.
 

  

Enterprise Rent-A-Car